Matthew Dowd , a veteran political analyst for MSNBC , was dismissed following controversial remarks regarding the fatal shooting of conservative activist Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University on 10 September 2025. During a live broadcast shortly after the incident, Dowd suggested that Kirk’s rhetoric and “divisive” words contributed to the environment that led to his death. His comments were widely condemned as insensitive and as blaming a murder victim. MSNBC swiftly issued an apology, describing Dowd’s remarks as unacceptable, and terminated his contract the same day, though Dowd later clarified that he did not intend to directly blame Kirk.
The Charlie Kirk shooting and Matthew Dowd’s remarks
Charlie Kirk, co-founder of Turning Point USA and a prominent conservative commentator, was fatally shot at a college event in Utah. During a broadcast shortly after the shooting, Dowd implied that Kirk’s rhetoric contributed to the circumstances of his death, stating, “Hateful thoughts lead to hateful words, which then lead to hateful actions.” He also speculated that the shooter might have acted in “celebration,” sparking outrage from viewers and political commentators.
Who is Matthew Dowd?
Matthew Dowd, 64, is a seasoned political analyst and commentator who joined MSNBC in 2022. He has had a long career in political media, including work at ABC News, and previously ran as a Democratic candidate for Texas lieutenant governor. Dowd is known for his analysis of electoral politics, social movements, and US political trends. His extensive media experience made him a prominent voice on political commentary prior to the controversy.
Backlash and MSNBC’s response
Dowd’s remarks were widely criticised as inappropriate and insensitive. MSNBC president Rebecca Kutler issued a formal apology, calling the comments unacceptable. Despite Dowd’s personal apology clarifying he did not intend to blame Kirk, the network terminated his contract immediately. Anchor Katy Tur, who also made controversial comments describing Kirk as “divisive,” remains with MSNBC but has faced criticism for politicising the tragedy.
Media and public reaction
The firing highlighted tensions in media coverage surrounding politically charged violent incidents. Many commentators emphasised that victim-blaming is unacceptable and that political discourse should not be linked to acts of violence. The incident has sparked broader debates on how networks handle commentary in the immediate aftermath of tragedies, and how journalists navigate politically sensitive events.
The Charlie Kirk shooting and Matthew Dowd’s remarks
Charlie Kirk, co-founder of Turning Point USA and a prominent conservative commentator, was fatally shot at a college event in Utah. During a broadcast shortly after the shooting, Dowd implied that Kirk’s rhetoric contributed to the circumstances of his death, stating, “Hateful thoughts lead to hateful words, which then lead to hateful actions.” He also speculated that the shooter might have acted in “celebration,” sparking outrage from viewers and political commentators.
Who is Matthew Dowd?
Matthew Dowd, 64, is a seasoned political analyst and commentator who joined MSNBC in 2022. He has had a long career in political media, including work at ABC News, and previously ran as a Democratic candidate for Texas lieutenant governor. Dowd is known for his analysis of electoral politics, social movements, and US political trends. His extensive media experience made him a prominent voice on political commentary prior to the controversy.
Backlash and MSNBC’s response
Dowd’s remarks were widely criticised as inappropriate and insensitive. MSNBC president Rebecca Kutler issued a formal apology, calling the comments unacceptable. Despite Dowd’s personal apology clarifying he did not intend to blame Kirk, the network terminated his contract immediately. Anchor Katy Tur, who also made controversial comments describing Kirk as “divisive,” remains with MSNBC but has faced criticism for politicising the tragedy.
Media and public reaction
The firing highlighted tensions in media coverage surrounding politically charged violent incidents. Many commentators emphasised that victim-blaming is unacceptable and that political discourse should not be linked to acts of violence. The incident has sparked broader debates on how networks handle commentary in the immediate aftermath of tragedies, and how journalists navigate politically sensitive events.
You may also like
'Welcome new interim govt': India hails Nepal as fellow democracy; vows to work closely with Kathmandu
'I was hammered' - Mikel Arteta points to Arsenal truth proving him right over pundit critics
Coronation Street's Becky actress teases how long she's on soap amid fake death twist
One Of Four Main Wheels Falls Off SpiceJet Flight After Take-Off From Kandla, Makes Safe Landing In Mumbai Amid Full Emergency
Britain's crumbling museums spent £29m on repairs as taxpayers help cover bill