India on Friday abstained from voting in International Monetary Fund's Extended Fund Facility (EFF) lending program.
The world body reviewed the EFF lending program ($1 billion) and considered a fresh Resilience and Sustainability Facility (RSF) lending program ($1.3 billion) for Pakistan.
India raised concerns over the efficacy of IMF programs in in Pakistan given its poor track record, and also on the possibility of misuse of debt financing funds for state sponsored cross border terrorism.
In a statement, India said, "Pakistan has been a prolonged borrower from the IMF, with a very poor track record of implementation and of adherence to the IMF’s program conditions. In the 35 years since 1989, Pakistan has had disbursements from the IMF in 28 years. In the last 5 years since 2019, there have been 4 IMF programs."
India said that there would be no need for another bailout program if the previous grants were successful.
"Had the previous programs succeeded in putting in place a sound macro-economic policy environment, Pakistan would not have approached the Fund for yet another bail out program. India pointed out that such a track record calls into question either the effectiveness of the IMF program designs in case of Pakistan or their monitoring or their implementation by Pakistan."
India also said that Pakistan military's interference in economic affairs posed a risk of slippages and reversal of reforms, adding that even though a civil government is in power, the army plays a role in politics and economics.
"Pakistan military’s deeply entrenched interference in economic affairs poses significant risks of policy slippages and reversal of reforms. Even when a civilian government is in power now, the army continues to play an outsized role in domestic politics and extends its tentacles deep into the economy. In fact, a 2021 UN report described military-linked businesses as the 'largest conglomerate in Pakistan'. The situation has not changed for the better; rather the Pakistan Army now plays a leading role in the Special Investment Facilitation Council of Pakistan."
India further flagged the Pakistan chapter of the IMF Report on 'Evaluation of Prolonged Use of IMF Resources'. The report noted that there was a widespread perception that political considerations have an important role to play in the IMF lending to Pakistan.
"As a result of repeated bailouts, Pakistan’s debt burden is very high, which paradoxically makes it a too big to fail debtor for the IMF."
India pointed out that rewarding continued sponsorship of cross-border terrorism sends a dangerous message to the global community, exposes funding agencies and donors to reputational risks, and makes a mockery of global values.
"While the concern that fungible inflows from international financial institutions, like IMF, could be misused for military and state sponsored cross border terrorist purposes resonated with several member countries, the IMF response is circumscribed by procedural and technical formalities," India argued.
"This is a serious gap highlighting the urgent need to ensure that moral values are given appropriate consideration in the procedures followed by global financial institutions," India added.
The IMF took note of the India’s statements and its abstention from the vote.
The world body reviewed the EFF lending program ($1 billion) and considered a fresh Resilience and Sustainability Facility (RSF) lending program ($1.3 billion) for Pakistan.
India raised concerns over the efficacy of IMF programs in in Pakistan given its poor track record, and also on the possibility of misuse of debt financing funds for state sponsored cross border terrorism.
In a statement, India said, "Pakistan has been a prolonged borrower from the IMF, with a very poor track record of implementation and of adherence to the IMF’s program conditions. In the 35 years since 1989, Pakistan has had disbursements from the IMF in 28 years. In the last 5 years since 2019, there have been 4 IMF programs."
India said that there would be no need for another bailout program if the previous grants were successful.
"Had the previous programs succeeded in putting in place a sound macro-economic policy environment, Pakistan would not have approached the Fund for yet another bail out program. India pointed out that such a track record calls into question either the effectiveness of the IMF program designs in case of Pakistan or their monitoring or their implementation by Pakistan."
India also said that Pakistan military's interference in economic affairs posed a risk of slippages and reversal of reforms, adding that even though a civil government is in power, the army plays a role in politics and economics.
"Pakistan military’s deeply entrenched interference in economic affairs poses significant risks of policy slippages and reversal of reforms. Even when a civilian government is in power now, the army continues to play an outsized role in domestic politics and extends its tentacles deep into the economy. In fact, a 2021 UN report described military-linked businesses as the 'largest conglomerate in Pakistan'. The situation has not changed for the better; rather the Pakistan Army now plays a leading role in the Special Investment Facilitation Council of Pakistan."
India further flagged the Pakistan chapter of the IMF Report on 'Evaluation of Prolonged Use of IMF Resources'. The report noted that there was a widespread perception that political considerations have an important role to play in the IMF lending to Pakistan.
"As a result of repeated bailouts, Pakistan’s debt burden is very high, which paradoxically makes it a too big to fail debtor for the IMF."
India pointed out that rewarding continued sponsorship of cross-border terrorism sends a dangerous message to the global community, exposes funding agencies and donors to reputational risks, and makes a mockery of global values.
"While the concern that fungible inflows from international financial institutions, like IMF, could be misused for military and state sponsored cross border terrorist purposes resonated with several member countries, the IMF response is circumscribed by procedural and technical formalities," India argued.
"This is a serious gap highlighting the urgent need to ensure that moral values are given appropriate consideration in the procedures followed by global financial institutions," India added.
The IMF took note of the India’s statements and its abstention from the vote.
You may also like
Amber Heard welcomes twins into her family as she shares newborns' unique names
Remarkable history of felled Sycamore Gap tree from film icon to bitter feud
At least 35 Pak army personnels killed on LoC: DGMO Rajeev Ghai
Evangelos Marinakis slammed by Gary Neville over 'scandalous' Nottingham Forest incident
Strictly Come Dancing pro Vito Coppola discusses possible Giovanni Pernice comeback
