An Indian student’s F-1 visa application to the United States was placed on hold after the student failed to disclose details of their Reddit account in the DS-160 visa application form. The incident came to light after the student shared their experience anonymously on a popular visa-related subreddit, detailing how the visa officer flagged the omission during the in-person interview.
The student, who recently attended their visa interview at a US embassy, explained that their Reddit handle was public and did not contain any offensive or policy-violating content. However, the officer raised concerns that the social media profile had not been declared, despite being publicly accessible.
Authorities unable to view ‘public’ Reddit account
During the interview, the visa officer brought up the Reddit account and asked why it had not been mentioned in the DS-160 form. The student responded that the account was already public and therefore believed it did not need to be declared separately. However, the officer reportedly stated that the account was not visible at the time of review and questioned the applicant’s transparency.
“She mentioned that the account was not visible even though it was set to public, and at the end of the interview, she issued me a 221(g) slip requesting that I make all my social media handles public,” the student wrote in their post.
The applicant also expressed concern that a technical error may have prevented the officer from viewing the account, which could now negatively affect the application’s outcome. “My concern is that my account appeared private to her, even though it was already public. What if it’s a technical issue that recurs when she rechecks my handle, which may lead to a refusal?” the post added.
What is a 221(g) slip?
A 221(g) slip is issued when a US visa application requires additional administrative processing or documentation before a final decision can be made. It does not signify a rejection but often leads to extended delays. In such cases, applicants are advised to promptly submit any requested documents or clarifications.
In this student’s case, the consulate requested that all social media profiles be made fully public and accessible for review. The student was told the application would remain on hold until this verification step was completed.
Social media disclosure rules for US visa applicants
Since 2019, US visa applicants have been required to disclose their social media identifiers as part of the DS-160 non-immigrant visa application. This policy, introduced under the Trump administration, applies to most applicants under F (students), M (vocational), and J (exchange visitor) visa categories. The objective, according to US authorities, is to strengthen national security by identifying potential risks through digital behavior.
Recently, the US State Department reiterated this policy, directing visa applicants to ensure their listed social media accounts are publicly accessible to officers. Applicants who fail to comply or whose accounts cannot be viewed due to privacy settings may face additional scrutiny or delays.
Rise in social media-based visa reviews
Immigration lawyers have pointed out an increase in cases where student visa applications are delayed or flagged due to social media content or undisclosed digital activity. While most rejections stem from perceived immigration intent or misrepresentation, non-disclosure of social accounts has emerged as a frequent reason for 221(g) notices.
Experts warn that even if an account contains no problematic content, failing to mention it could be viewed as a red flag. The current scrutiny also coincides with heightened enforcement actions by US immigration agencies and growing concerns about foreign political activity on American campuses.
Implications for Indian students
The incident highlights the growing importance of digital transparency in the US visa process. With Indian students continuing to make up a significant share of international students in the US, any delays due to administrative processing can impact admission timelines, travel plans, and university reporting requirements.
Applicants are being urged to carefully review all digital disclosures in their application forms and confirm that their listed accounts are active, accessible, and free of any potentially questionable content.
The student has not yet confirmed whether the visa was ultimately approved, but the case has drawn attention across student forums. Sharing a warning to future applicants, the student wrote: “Even jokes or harmless comments online can trigger a response. Be sure to double-check your application and account settings.”
As digital footprints become a central part of the US visa vetting process, applicants are advised to take both their documentation and online presence seriously.
The student, who recently attended their visa interview at a US embassy, explained that their Reddit handle was public and did not contain any offensive or policy-violating content. However, the officer raised concerns that the social media profile had not been declared, despite being publicly accessible.
Authorities unable to view ‘public’ Reddit account
During the interview, the visa officer brought up the Reddit account and asked why it had not been mentioned in the DS-160 form. The student responded that the account was already public and therefore believed it did not need to be declared separately. However, the officer reportedly stated that the account was not visible at the time of review and questioned the applicant’s transparency.
“She mentioned that the account was not visible even though it was set to public, and at the end of the interview, she issued me a 221(g) slip requesting that I make all my social media handles public,” the student wrote in their post.
The applicant also expressed concern that a technical error may have prevented the officer from viewing the account, which could now negatively affect the application’s outcome. “My concern is that my account appeared private to her, even though it was already public. What if it’s a technical issue that recurs when she rechecks my handle, which may lead to a refusal?” the post added.
What is a 221(g) slip?
A 221(g) slip is issued when a US visa application requires additional administrative processing or documentation before a final decision can be made. It does not signify a rejection but often leads to extended delays. In such cases, applicants are advised to promptly submit any requested documents or clarifications.
In this student’s case, the consulate requested that all social media profiles be made fully public and accessible for review. The student was told the application would remain on hold until this verification step was completed.
Social media disclosure rules for US visa applicants
Since 2019, US visa applicants have been required to disclose their social media identifiers as part of the DS-160 non-immigrant visa application. This policy, introduced under the Trump administration, applies to most applicants under F (students), M (vocational), and J (exchange visitor) visa categories. The objective, according to US authorities, is to strengthen national security by identifying potential risks through digital behavior.
Recently, the US State Department reiterated this policy, directing visa applicants to ensure their listed social media accounts are publicly accessible to officers. Applicants who fail to comply or whose accounts cannot be viewed due to privacy settings may face additional scrutiny or delays.
Rise in social media-based visa reviews
Immigration lawyers have pointed out an increase in cases where student visa applications are delayed or flagged due to social media content or undisclosed digital activity. While most rejections stem from perceived immigration intent or misrepresentation, non-disclosure of social accounts has emerged as a frequent reason for 221(g) notices.
Experts warn that even if an account contains no problematic content, failing to mention it could be viewed as a red flag. The current scrutiny also coincides with heightened enforcement actions by US immigration agencies and growing concerns about foreign political activity on American campuses.
Implications for Indian students
The incident highlights the growing importance of digital transparency in the US visa process. With Indian students continuing to make up a significant share of international students in the US, any delays due to administrative processing can impact admission timelines, travel plans, and university reporting requirements.
Applicants are being urged to carefully review all digital disclosures in their application forms and confirm that their listed accounts are active, accessible, and free of any potentially questionable content.
The student has not yet confirmed whether the visa was ultimately approved, but the case has drawn attention across student forums. Sharing a warning to future applicants, the student wrote: “Even jokes or harmless comments online can trigger a response. Be sure to double-check your application and account settings.”
As digital footprints become a central part of the US visa vetting process, applicants are advised to take both their documentation and online presence seriously.
You may also like
Himachal to get enhanced royalty from Karcham-Wangtu hydro project
MMA champion 'shot five times' by masked thugs in brutal attack
Gujarat: Anand Municipal body renamed to honour Sardar Patel's legacy
Businessman Robbed of ₹7 Lakh at Gunpoint After Miscreants Ask for Cigarette in Jharkhand
Why Won't Jackson Wang Return To India? Singer Reveals On Great Indian Kapil Show
